Presentaciones orales en biomedicina

In 2005, the Esteve Foundation launched a new Training seminar on how to make a good oral presentation in the field of biomedicine. This new booklet brings together for the first time in Spanish some general recommendations that should be considered in order to make a good oral communication in the scientific field. The communication…

2010
E. Serés / L. Rosich / F. Bosch
Read More

Guide to the Medicinal Plants of Maghreb

The phenomenon of immigration has presented a challenge for health professionals, not only regarding communication problems, but also in relation to the traditional customs for the treatment of diseases prevalent in the countries of origin. A large percentage of immigrants to Spain come from the Maghreb, where the use of medicinal plants in folk medicine…

2010
JA. del Villar Ruiz de la Torre / E. Melo Herráiz
Read More

Baños JE et al. Reflections on Running Training Workshops for Research Ethics Committee Members in Spain Between 2001 and 2008. Croat Med J 2010; 51:552-559

This article, published in 2010 in the Croatian Medical Journal, aim to present the experience of running workshops for members of research ethics committees (REC) in Spain from 2001-2008 by a non-profit institution. Documento entero Documento completo JE. Baños / MI. Lucena / E. Serés / F. Bosch [wpdm id=932 type=”btn”]

2010
Read More

Els misteris del sistema immunitari. Com protegeix el nostre cos

In 2008, The Japanese Immunology Foundation published a book to help young people aged 10 to 14 years better understand the functioning of the immune system. After being impressed by its educational potential, European researchers decided to finance an English translation of the book. Your Amazing immune system was published in 2009 by the European…

2010
M. Miyasaka
Read More

Marcovitch H, et al. Conflict of Interest in Science Communication: More than a Financial Issue. Report from Esteve Foundation Discussion Group. Croat Med J. 2010; 51:7-15

A systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that around 2% of scientists admit to have falsified research at least once. Up to 33% admit other questionable practices as plagiarism, duplicate publication, undisclosed changes in pre-research protocols or dubious ethical behaviour. There can be no doubt that discovered cases of research and publication misconduct represent a tip…

2010
Read More